Skip to main content

Five Biggest Medical Coding Mistakes You Can Avoid

“Oops! That’s my mistake”. “No problem, everybody makes mistakes”. “But I am a medical coder”. “What?!!! You are a criminal”!
Everybody makes mistakes. But not a medical coder! Medical coders are counted as among the most meticulous and careful professionals. Any mistakes they make directly impact the financial revenue of hospitals and the processing of medical claims by insurance companies. Despite their dedication to accuracy, stress associated with deadlines and matters of productivity may sometimes leave them vulnerable to making mistakes. Here are five biggest mistakes that you can avoid during your regular tryst in the frightening yet incredible world of medical coding.

1.     Mistake #1: Depending on Memory

Okay…so you have a great memory. Working for hours in the field, you are bound to memorise codes for a number of repeated procedures. But we’ll tell you – coding from memory is one of the biggest blunders! Coders tend to memorise basic codes and no longer rely on reference books, skimming medical records only superficially. Falling into routine, they may simply over-rely on coding software, memory based coding and cheat sheets. However, when coding from memory, you may run the risk of putting in the wrong codes because all medical conditions, procedures, etc. vary from case to case.
For instance, if you wrote the direct code for CHF (congestive heart failure) several times, you are bound to remember the code and use it every other time. However, if you read the documentation carefully, it may actually say that a patient was diagnosed with systolic CHF, which has a different code. Similarly, there are different codes for hypertension and malignant hypertension. Simply recalling codes from memory and keying them in is thus a hazard. Make sure you read the documentation carefully and find out the correct codes from reference books rather than merely using shortcuts.

2.     Mistake #2: Incorrect Selection of Principal Diagnosis

Lack of enough knowledge of coding terminology and principles, or lack of considerable experience may result in incorrect selection of the principal diagnosis. Coders may tend to code a complication as a condition, a definitive diagnosis as a symptom, or assume a diagnosis without the condition’s definitive documentation. They may also code only from the discharge summary rather than the entire documentation. Such misinterpretation of coding guidelines may occur when coders do not read the encoder messages, coding references, editor’s notes and inclusion and exclusion terms carefully. To avoid this blunder, coders should stay up to date on coding guidelines and should carefully read the reference books, accompanying editor’s remarks, and the medical documentation of the patient completely.

3.      Mistake #3: Incorrect Use of Modifiers

The misuse of modifiers is one of the most common coding mistakes, especially that of modifier 25. Modifier 25 indicates that a separate E&M (Evaluation and Management) service in addition to a minor surgical procedure was performed by the physician for the patient on the same day. If this modifier is simply used to code for the decision making portion of the patient’s visit, it is a gross error.
For instance, when a physician determines that a particular head trauma patient requires sutures, and confirms his immunization and allergy status, obtains informed consent and carries out the repair procedure, it is not considered as an E&M service and modifier 25 is not to be used in this case. However, if the physician also carries out a necessary full neurological examination, it may be reportable as a separate E&M service. Many minor surgical procedures have a global 10 day surgical period during which any follow up services for that procedure do not qualify as separate services. For major surgeries, a 90-day global surgical period applies.
Sometimes, coders also mix up modifiers 51 and 59. Modifier 59 is used if the same surgical procedure is carried out on multiple sites (for instance, removing lesions on various parts of the body through separate incisions). On the other hand, modifier 51 is required to report multiple procedures such as endoscopy and colonoscopy that are performed together.

4.     Mistake #4: Errors in Medical Code Unbundling

Medical codes are bundled when they belong to a single billable procedure. For instance, a surgeon may make an incision before a surgery. If it is an incidental incision, the surgeon will be required to close the incision. A normal closure of the incision is also incidental because the incision was made incidentally. Therefore, codes for these need to be bundled as there is no need for separate billing. It is thus important to know which procedures can be bundled and which cannot.

5.      Mistake #5: Ignoring Editorial Comments in Reference Books

The editorial comments that accompany various sections of a CPT book are extremely important as they have answers to many troubling questions that a coder or biller may have. For instance, if you are wondering whether you should report/bill for a preliminary hospital service when admitting a pregnant woman in labour, you can simply find the answer in the introductory editorial comments of the CPT book’s maternity section! Simple! 


Popular posts from this blog

That’s Hilarious! Funny Must-Read Medical Transcription Errors!

Doctors every now and then come across some very critical bloopers from medical transcriptionists. Some of these can be downright funny! It’s common for transcription errors to creep in for various reasons like the dictation might not be clear, too many medical terms stuffed in, or misunderstanding at the transcriptionist’s end. Medical transcriptionists vary in experience and skill and may not be well versed with some medical terms. Here is a compilation of some very funny transcription mistakes you could note to avoid being on the receiving end of the laughter! 

   ·"Eyes and nose continue to be within normal limits" (I & O).    ·"History of sick as hell disease" (sickle cell)    ·"She was a bitch and grinned" (a bit chagrined).    ·"The last day the patient took their meds was for beaver."  (forever).    ·“49 year old occasional male”(Caucasian male).    ·“Borderline respectable pancreatic cancer”. (Resectable).    ·“Patient is alert and orien…

Healthcare Documentation – A Promising Career Option -Avontix

Picture courtesy:
With ever-changing legal and medical requirements, it is mandatory that all the procedures and processes performed by healthcare practitioners are recorded accurately not just for evidential purposes but for future references also. However, it is not possible for the physicians, nurses, and other healthcare professionals to keep documenting each and every process performed by them in a written format. Hence, physicians take advantage of the technological advancements and record the procedures performed by them in audio files using an electronic device. Although these can serve as records, it is not easy to comprehend a physician’s voice file when the information is required. So, these voice files are transcribed into electronic documents and this process of transcribing is called medical transcription or healthcare documentation.  
The voice files given by the physicians for healthcare documentation include their office visits, emergency room …

Continuous Improvement – The Secret of Self Improvement -Avontix

What is that we typically do for self-improvement? Set a large goal; try to accomplish that in the least possible time. At the outset, this seems perfectly alright but does not work in practicality. It often leads to exhaustion, frustration and failure. This pattern needs to change; instead, we should aim for simple path of continuous improvement by slowly fine-tuning our everyday behavior and habits. Continuous improvement means, making minor changes and adjustments in our everyday life with the anticipation of a remarkable change over a period of time.

It’s not that easy to believe that small changes can lead to big shifts of improvement because we can’t see any notable accomplishments on a daily basis, BUT IT WORKS. Minor alterations don’t show results at that particular point of time but add up over a period, hence, we can see the results only in the long run; in fact, it is possible that we may happen that we may not even recognize it initially.

How do we go about it?

Avoid mistak…